artificial intelligence ethical harm cross-border contracts liability good faith AI Act CISG UNIDROIT Principles.

LIABILITY FOR ETHICAL HARM ARISING FROM THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS: GAPS AND CONTRACTUAL MECHANISMS

1 автор
18 апреля 2026

Авторы

Uktamova Farangiz Muzaffar qizi

Информация о публикации

Том: 91
Выпуск: 2
Страницы: 468-476
Журнал: ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

Метрики

37 просмотров
PDF доступен
Скачать PDF

Аннотация

This article examines the issue of the lack of legal mechanisms for redressing harm arising from ethical breaches in artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms within international commercial practice (B2B). Based on an analysis of the 1980 Vienna Convention, the UNIDROIT Principles, as well as the provisions of the EU AI Act and UNESCO’s codes of ethics, gaps have been identified: ethical harm cannot be reduced to traditional categories of loss, and soft law does not create liability between contracting parties. The author proposes a classification of AI ethical violations

Ключевые слова

artificial intelligence ethical harm cross-border contracts liability good faith AI Act CISG UNIDROIT Principles.

Полный текст статьи

Полный текст статьи недоступен

Пожалуйста, скачайте PDF-файл для просмотра полного текста

Список литературы

[1]

1.

[2]

United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods

[3]

(CISG), 1980. United Nations.

[4]

2.

[5]

UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, 2022.

[6]

3.

[7]

4.

[8]

5.

[9]

6.

[10]

7.

[11]

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act) // Official Journal of the European Union.

[12]

UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (2021).

[13]

OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2019, revised 2024).

[14]

Bridge M. The International Sale of Goods. Oxford University Press, 2019.

[15]

Smuha N.A. From a ‘race to the bottom’ to a ‘race to the top’: an analysis of the

[16]

EU’s AI Act // European Law Review. 2021. Vol. 46. No. 3.

[17]

8.

[18]

Veale M., Borgesius F.Z. Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act

[19]

// Computer Law Review International. 2021. Vol. 22. No. 4.

[20]

9.

[21]

Scherer M.U. Artificial Intelligence and Contracts: Towards a New Legal

[22]

Paradigm // Journal of Law and Technology. 2019. Vol. 39. No. 2.

[23]

10. Chopra S., White L.F. A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents.

[24]

University of Michigan Press, 2011.

[25]

11. Zamir E., Ritov I. Reputational Damages in Contract Law // Journal of Legal

[26]

Studies. 2018. Vol. 47. No. 2.

Похожие статьи